Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 3600X - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $210.0 vs $275.13
- Up to 23% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700K - $1.89 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
76%
Price, $
$275.13
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 617 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |