Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 272 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |