Buy on Amazon
$175
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 33% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 220 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
49.31381518755718%
Multi-Core
3819
44.5156778179275%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.