Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 130 days newer than Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Core i3-4350 - 181 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |