Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 12% better in Cities: Skylines II than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 18 vs 16 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
18
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |