Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1545M v5 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1545M v5 is 1238 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 184 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |