Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 639 days newer than Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4930K - 130 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |