Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 91 days older than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-6100 - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |