Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 406 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 120 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
