Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3153 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1270 - 175 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1270
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
