Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 48 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-6300 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
189
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |