Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1177 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 187 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |