Buy on Amazon
$99.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $339
Availability
MSRP in USD: $339
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 913 days older than Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 105 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU Used 6-Core 12-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 16M 95W Socket AM4
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5556 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1270 v5 or Ryzen 5 2600X
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
38 FPS
$26.32/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Ryzen 5 2600X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
