Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 132 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
