Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 1311 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G3930 - 298 vs 293 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
293
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |