Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 572 days newer than Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Performs up to 1% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-750 - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
