Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 84 days older than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E3-1260L - 101 vs 95 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
101
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |