Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1260L - 161 vs 152 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |