Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 210 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$708.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $708.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |