Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1561 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 80 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |