Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E3-1231 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3061 days newer than Xeon E3-1231 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1231 v3 - 222 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1231 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
