Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1231 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1231 v3 is 120 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 128 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 80 vs 135 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1231 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
