Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $203
Availability
MSRP in USD: $203
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 112 vs 102 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
