Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2746 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 35 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 69 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
