Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 337 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Xeon E-2276M - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 20 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
