Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1371 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E-2176M - 134 vs 129 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |