Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 358 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 107 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
