Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 595 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 3000G - 204 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
