Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E-2136 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 658 days newer than Xeon E-2136.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E-2136 - 260 vs 259 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 20 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5775 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |