Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3504 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in DOOM Eternal than Pentium P6200 - 500 vs 444 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 20 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
500
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |