Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 708 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium P6200 - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 4 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |