Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2531 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium P6100 - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
