Buy on Amazon
$149.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $149.99 vs $485.95
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.84 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 21% better in Dota 2 than Pentium G4620 - 216 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
178
82.4074074074074%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41309 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
37.33333333333333%
Price, $
$485.95
30%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $485.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
44.424882629107984%
Multi-Core
1599
14.949513836948391%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
