Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $149.99 vs $235.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-10700K - $1.23 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G4620 - 136 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 16 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
122
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
70%
Price, $
$235.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |