Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 2600 - 193 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $85.76 vs $235.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-10700K - $0.49 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
40%
Price, $
$235.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
176
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |