Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 855 days older than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $149.99 vs $429.95
- Up to 63% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-5820K - $1.85 vs $5.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Pentium G4620 - 85 vs 81 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
81
95.29411764705881%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45290 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.06/FPS
36.56126482213439%
Price, $
$429.95
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
65.25862068965517%
Multi-Core
1599
29.377181701267684%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |