Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1326 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-5820K - 175 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |