Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $149.99 vs $490.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10900K - $0.9 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Pentium G4620 - 211 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
79.14691943127961%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41363 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
38.793103448275865%
Price, $
$490
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
43.281875357347054%
Multi-Core
1599
17.450616610280477%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |