Buy on Amazon
$149.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4620 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - 195 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-8350 - $149.99 vs $182.02
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - $0.77 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4620 3.7GHz 3MB Kaby Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39449 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
191
97.94871794871794%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
81.05263157894737%
Price, $
$182.02
82%
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 FX8350 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8350FRW8KHK FD8350FRHKBOX 4GHz 8MB 8 cores
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
