Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4500.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4500
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $84.19 vs $165.86
- Up to 43% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.33 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4500 - 286 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4500 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $84.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4897 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
56%
Price, $
$165.86
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4500 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |