Buy on Amazon
$26.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $26.99 vs $210.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-11900F - $0.12 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 19% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G4400 - 272 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
229
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz Dual-Core 2-Thread CPU Processor 3M 54W LGA 1151
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
