Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $26.99 vs $87.98
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-10105F - $0.18 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Pentium G4400 - 152 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
31%
Price, $
$87.98
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |