Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Pentium G3420 - 163 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $21.1 vs $85.13
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - $0.14 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
26%
Price, $
$85.13
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13092 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
146
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |