Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G540 - 217 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $19.25 vs $85.13
- Up to 77% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10105F - $0.09 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
23%
Price, $
$85.13
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13431 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
210
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |