Buy on Amazon
$21.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 1220 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 46% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $21.1 vs $39.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G3930T - $0.19 vs $0.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3420 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G3420 3.2 GHz Used Dual-Core CPU Processor 3M 53W LGA 1150
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3420
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
