Buy on Amazon
$51.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3507 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $51.36 vs $100.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-14100F - $0.44 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G3258 - 153 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
117
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
66%
Price, $
$100.99
50%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 53 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
