Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1220 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Saints Row than Pentium G3220T - 148 vs 146 FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |