Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220 is 690 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-4100 - 275 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
