Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 674 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 15 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 67% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Pentium 3825U - 50 vs 30 FPS
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
50
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |