Key Differences
In short — Pentium 3825U outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium 3825U is 1236 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |